Detection and analysis of signals of adverse events of memantine based on the US food and drug administration adverse event reporting system.

BACKGROUND: Despite its widespread use, the adverse effects (AEs) of memantine have not been well documented, and there is a need to find new ways to analyze the AEs of memantine. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: AEs in which the primary suspected drug was memantine were retrieved from the FAERS database. The proportional report ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM) were used to detect potential positive signals between memantine and AEs. SAS, MySQL, EXCEL, and R language software were used for data processing and statistical analysis. RESULTS: This study gathered a total of 5808 reports of AEs associated with memantine. Of these reports, a greater proportion of female patients (51.17%) than male patients (36.33%) had AEs. The AEs reported by FAERS were mainly in psychiatric category (n = 2157, IC025 = 2.69), various neurologic disorders (n = 1608, IC025 = 2.04), systemic disorders and various site reactions (n = 842, IC025 = 1.29). Unexpected ocular adverse events have been reported, ophthalmic vein thrombosis (n = 4, IC025 = 3.47) and scleral discolouration (n = 7, IC025 = 3.1), which may worsen glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: This study observed conceivable new AEs signals and may supply important assist for scientific monitoring and threat identification of memantine.

[Multi-center open comparative randomized study of efficacy and safety of Akatinol Memantine 20 mg (single-doses) vs Akatinol Memantine 10 mg (double-doses) in patients with vascular dementia]. / Mnogotsentrovoe otkrytoe sravnitel'noe randomizirovannoe issledovanie effektivnosti i bezopasnosti primeneniya preparata Akatinol Memantin, 20 mg (odnokratnyi priem) v sravnenii s preparatom Akatinol Memantin, 10 mg (dvukratnyi priem) u patsientov s sosudistoi dementsiei.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the drug Acatinol Memantine, 20 mg (once daily) in comparison with the drug Acatinol Memantine, 10 mg (twice daily) in patients with moderate to moderate severe vascular dementia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 130 patients aged 50-85 years of both sexes with instrumentally and clinically confirmed vascular dementia. The patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group I consisted of 65 patients receiving Akatinol Memantine, 20 mg once daily, group II - 65 patients receiving Akatinol Memantine, 10 mg twice daily for 24 weeks. Clinical, parametric and statistical research methods were used. The Alzheimer's disease assessment scale, the cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog), the short mental Status Assessment Scale (MMSE) and the general clinical impression scale for patients condition and illness severity (CGI-C and CGI-S) and the Hamilton Depression Rating scale (HAM-D) were used. Adverse events were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: At week 24, both groups showed statistically significant positive change in ADAS-cog total score: in group I the total score was 27.2±8.76 points (absolute difference from baseline 3.5 points; p<0.01), and in group II - 26.1±7.86 points (absolute difference from baseline 2.5 points; p<0.01) with no statistically significant differences between groups. Evaluation of secondary efficacy criteria (change in ADAS-cog total score at week 12 and MMSE at weeks 4, 12, and 24) also revealed statistically significant benefit in both groups compared to baseline with no significant differences between groups. Statistically significant improvement was noticed on CGI-S and CGI-C scales in both groups. Akatinol Memantine was safe and well tolerated in both groups. CONCLUSION: The study showed no lesser efficacy and safety of Akatinol Memantine, 20 mg (once daily) compared to Akatinol Memantine, 10 mg (twice daily) in patients with moderate and moderately severe vascular dementia.

Case report: a unique presentation of memantine overdose causing echolalia and hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Since 2003 when memantine was first approved for use in the management of moderate-severe Alzheimer's dementia, its use has become more widespread and is being explored in other diseases like neuropathic pain, epilepsy, and mood disorders. Our case uniquely highlights two important adverse effects in a patient who overdosed on memantine. One is hypertension, which is easy to overlook as a medication side effect. The other is echolalia which is the repetition of words and phrases spoken by another person. It is commonly seen in children with autism spectrum disorder and has been reported in older adults with head injuries, delirium, and neurocognitive disorders. The aim of this patient story is to highlight the importance of medication reconciliation with caregivers and knowledge of adverse drug reactions in patient management. This case report has been presented previously in the form of an abstract at the American Geriatrics Society Presidential poster session in May 2023. CASE PRESENTATION: Our patient is an 86-year-old man with mild dementia and hypertension, who was brought to the emergency department (ED) due to abrupt onset of altered mental status and auditory hallucinations. Investigations including blood work, CT head and an electroencephalogram (EEG) did not reveal an etiology for this change in his condition. Due to elevated blood pressure on presentation, a nicardipine drip was started, and he was given IV midazolam to assist with obtaining imaging. While reviewing medications with his daughter, it was noted that sixty memantine pills were missing from the bottle. Poison control was contacted and they confirmed association of these features with memantine. With supportive care, his symptoms resolved in less than 100 h, consistent with the half-life of memantine. Notably, our patient was started on Memantine one month prior to this presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertensive urgency and echolalia were the most striking symptoms of our patient's presentation. Though hypertension is a known sign of memantine overdose, it can easily be contributed to medication non-compliance in patients with dementia, being treated for hypertension. According to our literature review, this the first case of memantine overdose presenting with echolalia, a sign that is not commonly associated with adverse reactions to medications. This highlights the importance of an early medication review, especially with caregivers of people with dementia.

New bithiophene derivative attenuated Alzheimer's disease induced by aluminum in a rat model via antioxidant activity and restoration of neuronal and synaptic transmission.

BACKGROUND: One of the hypotheses that leads to an increased incidence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the accumulation of aluminum in the brain's frontal cortex. The present study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic role of a novel bithiophene derivative at two doses against AlCl3-induced AD in a rat model. METHODOLOGY: Adult male rats were divided into six groups, 18 rats each. Group 1: naïve animals, group 2: animals received a daily oral administration of bithiophene dissolved in DMSO (1 mg/kg) for 30 days every other day, groups 3-6: animals received a daily oral administration of AlCl3 (100 mg/kg/day) for 45 consecutive days. Groups 4 and 5 received an oral administration of low or high dose of the bithiophene (0.5 or 1 mg/kg, respectively). Group 6; Animals were treated with a daily oral dose of memantine (20 mg/kg) for 30 consecutive days. MAIN FINDINGS: Al disturbed the antioxidant milieu, elevated the lipid peroxidation, and depleted the antioxidants. It also disturbed the synaptic neurotransmission by elevating the activities of acetylcholine esterase and monoamine oxidase resulting in the depletion of dopamine and serotonin and accumulation of glutamate and norepinephrine. Al also deteriorated the expression of genes involved in apoptosis and the production of amyloid-ß plaques as well as phosphorylation of tau. The new bithiophene at the low dose reversed most of the previous deleterious effects of aluminum in the cerebral cortex and was in many instances superior to the reference drug; memantine. CONCLUSION: Taking together, the bithiophene modulated the AD etiology through antioxidant activity, prevention of neuronal and synaptic loss, and probably mitigating the formation of amyloid-ß plaques and phosphorylation of tau.

Effect of Cerebralcare Granule® combined with memantine on Alzheimer's disease.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: In elderly people, Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia. It has been shown that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) based on phytomedicines enhances the therapeutic effects of modern medicine when taken in conjunction with them. Modern medicine N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA) antagonist memantine (Mm) are mainly used in the clinical treatment of AD. TCM Cerebralcare Granule® (CG) has long been an effective treatment for headaches, dizziness, and other symptoms. In this study, we employ a blend of CG and Mm to address Alzheimer's disease-like symptoms and explore their impacts and underlying mechanisms. AIM OF THE STUDY: The objective of our study was to observe the effects of CG combined with Memantine (Mm) on learning and memory impairment of AD mice induced by D-galactose and to explore the mechanism at work. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CG and Mm were combined to target multiple pathological processes involved in AD. For a thorough analysis, we performed various experiments such as behavioral detection, pathological detection, proteomic detection, and other experimental methods of detection. RESULTS: It was found that the combination of CG and Mm was significantly effective for improving learning and memory in AD mice as well as brain pathology. The serum and hippocampal tissue of AD mice were significantly enhanced with catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels were decreased with this treatment. In AD mice, a combination of Mm and CG (CG + Mm) significantly increased the levels of the anti-inflammatory factors IL-4 and IL-10, decreased the levels of pro-inflammatory factors (IL-6, IL-1ß) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), improved synaptic plasticity by restoring synaptophysin (SYP) and postsynaptic density protein-95 (PSD-95) expression in the hippocampus, enhanced Aß phagocytosis of microglia in AD mice, and increased mitochondrial respiratory chain enzyme complexes I, II, III, and IV, lead to an increase in the number of functionally active NMDA receptors in the hippocampus. Proteomic analysis GO analysis showed that the positive regulation gene H3BIV5 of G protein coupled receptor signal pathway and synaptic transmission was up-regulated, while the transsynaptic signal of postsynaptic membrane potential and regulation-related gene Q5NCT9 were down-regulated. Most proteins showed significant enriched signal transduction pathway profiles after CG + Mm treatment, based on the KEGG pathway database. CONCLUSION: The data supported the idea that CG and Mm could be more effective in treating AD mice induced by D-galactose than Mm alone. We provided a basis for the clinical use of CG with Mm.

[Pathogenetic therapy of cognitive impairment: results of a multicenter placebo-controlled clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of Miladean]. / Patogeneticheskaya terapiya kognitivnykh narushenii: rezul'taty mnogotsentrovogo platsebo-kontroliruemogo klinicheskogo issledovaniya effektivnosti i bezopasnosti preparata Miladean.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the use of the drug Miladean in the treatment of patients with cognitive disorders (CDs) of vascular genesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In during the double-blind multicenter prospective randomized placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial, 300 patients with CDs and chronic cerebral ischemia were randomized into 3 groups: group 1 (n=100) received Miladean (daily dose: memantine 10 mg + melatonin 6 mg), group 2 (n=101) - memantine (10 mg/day), group 3 - placebo (n=99) for 8 weeks. The dynamics of the overall score (the primary criterion of effectiveness) and the proportion of patients with improvement on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog), the dynamics of visual-spatial orientation disorders (Benton test), sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scale) and the safety of therapy were evaluated. RESULTS: Miladean demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of CDs: a statistically and clinically significant decrease in the overall score on the ADAS-Sod scale was shown (by 6.1 versus 4.7 and 3.5 points in the 2nd (p=0.009) and 3rd (p<0.05) groups) and an increase in the proportion of patients (96.9%) with clinically and statistically a significant improvement compared to the 2nd and 3rd groups (p=0.019 and p<0.001 respectively). Miladean significantly improved the performance in the Benton test (1.20±1.66 vs. 0.64±1.69 points in group 3, p=0.026) and sleep quality (84.7% of patients with CDs), compared to placebo (63.9%) and memantine (64.3%) (p=0.002 in both cases). Miladean was well tolerated, there were no cases of interaction with basic therapy drugs. CONCLUSION: The combination of many different pathogenetic effects of Miladean suggests that it has the ability to slow down the rate of progression of CDs and stabilize the condition of patients. The unique combination of active substances in Miladean has been proven to be effective and safe in the treatment of patients with CDs.

Effects of thymoquinone and memantine alone and in combination on memory and hippocampal morphology in rats with streptozotocin-induced Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease. Thymoquinone (TQ) has broad biological functions, including antiinflammatory, antioxidant, neuroprotective properties. Memantine (MEM) is indicated for the symptomatic treatment of moderate to severe AD. We aimed to evaluate the effect of TQ alone or in combination with MEM on memory and hippocampal morphology in an STZ-induced rat AD model. METHODS: Thirty male rats were included in this study. The AD model was created by giving ICV STZ. The rats were divided into 5 groups (n = 6 each). Group 1 (control group): The rats received only ICV-STZ 3 mg/kg for 2 weeks. Group 2 (sham group): In addition to ICV STZ, 9% NaCl, 1 mL/day i.p. for 2 weeks of injection, was applied. Group 3 (TQ group): In addition to ICV STZ, rats received TQ 10 mg/kg i.p. for 2 weeks. Group 4 (MEM group): In addition to ICV STZ, rats were given MEM at a dose of 5 mg/kg for two weeks. Group 5 (TQ+MEM group): In addition to ICV STZ, this group was given TQ (10 mg/kg/day, i.p.) and MEM (5 mg/kg/day, i.p.) for 2 weeks. On the 15th day, passive avoidance learning (PAL) was applied to all groups. Then, rats were sacrificed, neurons in the hippocampal CA1, CA2, CA3 regions were evaluated. RESULTS: Groups 3, 4, 5 had longer latency periods than groups 1 and 2. The neuron density in the CA1, CA2, CA3 regions had decreased in groups 1 and 2 compared to groups 3, 4, 5. There were significantly more neurons in groups 3, 4, 5 than in groups 1 and 2. DISCUSSION: We found that TQ alone and in combination with MEM showed ameliorative effects on memory and hippocampal morphology. TQ may offer a promising treatment strategy for AD.

Management of diabetic neuropathy with memantine: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes patients frequently experience diabetic neuropathy (DN), a microvascular complication that significantly reduces patients' quality of life. Memantine has demonstrated potential benefits for neuropathic pains in preclinical studies. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of memantine in the management of peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHOD: This randomized clinical trial includes 143 diabetic patients (aged between 18 and 75 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive memantine 5 mg twice daily for 1 week, followed by 10 mg twice daily plus gabapentin 300 mg daily (n = 72) or just gabapentin 300 mg daily (n = 71) for 8 weeks. The DN4 questionnaire, monofilament, tuning fork, and Tip-therm tests were used to measure neuropathy at baseline and after the 8-week intervention. RESULTS: The mean score of the DN4 questionnaire in the memantine group was significantly lower than the control group (p. value: .001). The number of patients with diabetic neuropathy remarkably decreased in the memantine group at the end of the study based on the performed tests (p. value: .001). CONCLUSION: Memantine functions as a beneficial agent in the management of diabetic neuropathy, which would significantly improve the quality of life in diabetic patients.

Edaravone Improves Streptozotocin-Induced Memory Impairment via Alleviation of Behavioral Dysfunction, Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Histopathological Parameters.

Alzheimer's disease (AD), as the main cause of dementia, has a progressive and neurodegenerative pattern with number of cases increasing over the next decades. Therefore, discovering an effective treatment with the ability to invert memory impairment and pathophysiological events of AD seems to be required. The present study performed to investigate the probable effects of Edaravone (EDV) in AD-like disorder induced by intracerebroventricular streptozotocin (ICV-STZ) administration in mice. This study also compares the two different methods of ICV-STZ in the memory impairment induction. NMRI male mice were administrated with 3 mg/kg of STZ for two times during 48 hours span, and after 24 hours, animals were treated with EDV (5 and 10 mg/kg), Donepezil, and Memantine for 14 days. After behavioral tests regarding memory and cognitive function, animals were sacrificed, and the hippocampi were utilized for further analyses. Our results demonstrated that administration of STZ induced memory impairment in the Morris water maze (MWM) test and decreased the discriminative factor in novel object recognition (NOR). The biochemical output shows a significant decrease in ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and glutathione (GSH) levels followed by increase in malondialdehyde (MDA) and protein carbonylation (PCO) levels. The output showed no difference between the patterns of AD-like disorder induction. Following our treatment groups, administration of EDV (5 and 10 mg/kg), Donepezil, and Memantine significantly improved memory performance and discriminatory behavior. Aforementioned treatments managed to improve FRAP and GSH content of hippocampus, while significantly attenuating MDA, PCO, and nitric oxide overproduction. In addition, no significant difference has been observed between the effect of 5 and 10 mg/kg EDV application. It was supposed that EDV managed to ameliorate memory dysfunction, discriminatory behavior, oxidative stress, and cellular antioxidant power in a dose-independent pattern in mice.

Adverse Drug Event Profile Associated with Anti-dementia Drugs: Analysis of a Spontaneous Reporting Database.

Adverse drug events (ADEs) rates associated with anti-dementia acetylcholinesterase inhibitors are estimated to be 5%-20% and show a wide range of symptoms. No report has examined whether there is a difference in the anti-dementia drugs' ADEs profile. This study aimed to establish whether anti-dementia drugs' ADEs profile differed. Data was based on the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) was used to analyze data for ADEs from April 2004-October 2021. The target drugs were donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, and memantine. The top ten most frequently occurring adverse events were selected. The association between the RORs and antidementia drug ADEs was evaluated, and compared the distribution rate of expression age related to ADEs and each ADEs' timing of onset due to anti-dementia drugs. The primary outcome was RORs. Secondary outcome were expression age and time-to-onset of ADE associated with anti-dementia drugs. A total of 705,294 reports were analyzed. The adverse events incidence differed. Bradycardia, loss of consciousness, falls, and syncope incidence were significantly diverse. The Kaplan-Meier curve results for the cumulative ADEs incidence showed that donepezil had the slowest onset, while galantamine, rivastigmine, and memantine had approximately the same timing of onset.

Memantine/Aripiprazole Combination Alleviates Cognitive Dysfunction in Valproic Acid Rat Model of Autism: Hippocampal CREB/BDNF Signaling and Glutamate Homeostasis.

Significant efforts are increasingly directed towards identifying novel therapeutic targets for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with a rising role of aberrant glutamatergic transmission in the pathogenesis of ASD-associated cellular and behavioral deficits. This study aimed at investigating the role of chronic memantine (20 mg/kg/day) and aripiprazole (3 mg/kg/day) combination therapy in the management of prenatal sodium valproate (VPA)-induced autistic-like/cognitive deficits in male Wistar rats. Pregnant female rats received a single intraperitoneal injection of VPA (600 mg/kg) to induce autistic-like behaviors in their offspring. Prenatal VPA induced autistic-like symptoms (decreased social interaction and the appearance of stereotyped behavior) with deficits in spatial learning (in Morris water maze) and cognitive flexibility (in the attentional set-shifting task) in addition to decreased hippocampal protein levels of phosphorylated cAMP response element-binding protein (p-CREB), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), and gene expression of glutamate transporter-1 (Glt-1) with a decline in GABA/glutamate ratio (both measured by HPLC). These were accompanied by the appearance of numerous neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) with enhanced apoptosis in hippocampal sections. Memantine/aripiprazole combination increased the protein levels of p-CREB, BDNF, and Glt-1 gene expression with restoration of GABA/glutamate balance, attenuation of VPA-induced neurodegenerative changes and autistic-like symptoms, and improvement of cognitive performance. This study draws attention to the favorable cognitive effects of memantine/aripiprazole combination in autistic subjects which could be mediated via enhancing CREB/BDNF signaling with increased expression of astrocytic Glt-1 and restoration of GABA/glutamate balance, leading to inhibition of hippocampal NFTs formation and neuronal apoptosis.

A phase II single-arm trial of memantine for prevention of cognitive decline during chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer: Feasibility, tolerability, acceptability, and preliminary effects.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive difficulties have been described after chemotherapy for breast cancer, but there is no standard of care to improve cognitive outcomes in these patients. This trial examined the feasibility, tolerability, acceptability, and preliminary effects of memantine to prevent cognitive decline during chemotherapy for breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with stage I-III breast cancer, scheduled for neo/adjuvant chemotherapy, completed a cognitive battery prior to and 4 weeks after completing chemotherapy. Memantine (10 mg BID) was administered concurrent with chemotherapy. Our primary cognitive outcome was visual working memory assessed by the Delayed Matching to Sample test. We used the Brief Medication Questionnaire to assess acceptability. RESULTS: Of 126 patients approached, 56 (44%) enrolled. Forty-five (80%) received ≥1 dose of memantine and completed pre-post assessments. Seventy-six percent reported taking ≥90% of scheduled doses. Participants were mean age of 56, 77% White, and 57% had stage I disease. Sixty-four percent had stable or improved Delayed Matching to Sample test scores. Stable or improved cognition was observed in 87%-91% across objective cognitive domain composite measures. Sixty-six percent self-reported stable or improved cognitive symptoms. There were seven greater than or equal to grade 3 adverse events; two were possibly related to memantine. Only 5% reported that taking memantine was a disruption to their lives. CONCLUSIONS: Memantine was well-tolerated and consistently taken by a large majority of patients receiving breast cancer chemotherapy. The majority demonstrated stable or improved cognition from pre- to post-assessment. Randomized trials are needed to determine memantine's efficacy to ameliorate cognitive loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04033419.

Safe Use of Memantine in a Pediatric Patient With Catatonia.

Pediatric catatonia is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome. Benzodiazepines are standard first-line pharmacotherapy. When benzodiazepines do not provide relief of symptoms, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most proven effective therapy. However, the use of NMDA antagonists (amantadine and memantine) has been reported effective in adult patients as adjuncts and may provide an alternative treatment modality when ECT is not readily accessible. To the author's knowledge there are no prior case reports of memantine used in pediatric catatonia. This case demonstrates the safe use of memantine as an adjunctive agent in an adolescent with catatonia.

Association between NMDAR antagonists, drug abuse and dependence: A disproportionality analysis from the WHO pharmacovigilance database.

Ketamine and dextromethorphan are widely abused psychoactive substances. Inhibition of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) results in neurobehavioural effects including hallucinations, "out of body" sensations and dissociative effects. However, little is known about a possible extended addictive class effect linked to pharmacologically-related amino-adamantane derivatives (e.g., amantadine and memantine). Using a quasi-Bayesian analytic method, we investigated the potential association between the use of approved NMDAR antagonists (i.e., dextromethorphan, ketamine, amantadine and memantine) and the reporting of drug abuse and dependence in the WHO pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase®), which includes >21 million individual case safety reports collected from >130 countries. This disproportionality analysis identified a significant association for all investigated drugs: dextromethorphan (IC = 3.03 [2.97-3.09]), ketamine (IC = 1.70 [1.57-1.83]), amantadine (IC = 0.21 [0.06-0.35]) and memantine (IC = 0.27 [0.13-0.40]), suggesting a class effect for drug abuse and dependence. This first signal requires further investigations, but health professionals need to be alert to the potential of abuse of NMDAR antagonists, especially in the current "opioid epidemic" context, due to their growing interest as non-opioid antinociceptive drugs.

Effectiveness and Safety of Memantine for Headache: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness and safety of memantine for headache are elusive, and this meta-analysis aimed to explore the influence of memantine versus placebo for headache. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through May 2021 and included randomized controlled trials reporting memantine versus placebo for headache patients. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 4 randomized controlled trials and 229 patients. Compared with control group for headache, memantine treatment could substantially reduce headache days (mean difference [MD] = -3.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -5.46 to -0.75; P = 0.01), pain intensity (MD, -0.43; 95% CI, -0.85 to -0.01; P = 0.04), monthly attack frequency (MD, -2.14; 95% CI, -2.83 to -1.46; P < 0.00001), and Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MD, -5.63; 95% CI, -6.46 to -4.79; P < 0.00001) but revealed no significant influence on days for acute pain medications, adverse events, or nausea/vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Memantine treatment is effective and safe to treat headache.

The efficacy and tolerability of memantine for depressive symptoms in major mental diseases: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis of double-blind randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To date, there is limited evidence on the antidepressant effects of memantine in patients with major mental diseases. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of memantine in such populations. METHODS: A literature search was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the date of their inception until September 28, 2021, using PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Changes in depression scores were the primary outcome. The response rate and remission rate to the treatment were secondary outcomes. We also assessed the dropout rate for tolerance. RESULTS: Eleven double-blind RCTs were included with 899 participants. Memantine significantly reduced depressive symptom scores compared with the control group (k = 11, n = 899, Hedges' g = -0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.30 to -0.04, p = 0.009) with a small effect size. For secondary outcomes, memantine did not show a significant effect on response rate nor remission rate. In the subgroup analysis, memantine significantly reduced depressive symptom scores in patients with mood disorders (k = 8, n = 673, Hedges' g = -0.17, 95% CI = -0.32 to -0.01, p = 0.035) with a small effect size, but not in patients with schizophrenia. CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis indicates that memantine effectively alleviates depressive symptoms in patients with mood disorders with a small effect size. Furthermore, memantine is well-tolerated and acceptable.

Analysis of clinically-reported, memantine-induced cardiovascular adverse responses using the halothane-anesthetized dogs: Reverse translational study.

Although NMDA receptor antagonist memantine is considered to be better tolerated than cholinesterase inhibitors on treating Alzheimer's disease, several types of cardiovascular adverse events have been associated with memantine treatment, including hypertension, myocardial infarction, severe bradycardia and QT-interval prolongation. In order to clarify how memantine induces these cardiovascular adverse events, we assessed its electropharmacological effects using the halothane-anesthetized dogs (n = 4). Memantine hydrochloride was intravenously administered in doses of 0.01, 0.1 and 1 mg/kg over 10 min, providing subtherapeutic, clinically-relevant and supratherapeutic concentrations, respectively. The low to high doses increased the mean blood pressure and left ventricular contraction and enhanced the atrioventricular nodal conduction, suggesting an increase of sympathicotonic output from the central nervous system similarly to donepezil, which might induce myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. Meanwhile, the high dose suppressed the intra-atrial conduction and the low to high doses inhibited the intra-ventricular conduction, indicating potential to induce severe bradycardic adverse event by advanced cardiac conduction block in susceptible patients. Memantine alone did not induce repolarization delay, indicating lack of risk for inducing torsade de pointes. Thus, these in vivo experimental findings may provide basic information to better understand the clinically observed adverse events of memantine.

Evaluation of memantine's efficacy and safety in the treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The United States Food and Drug Administration has approved drugs that address only autism-related symptoms rather than the underlying impairments. N-Methyl-D-Aspartate  receptor antagonists have recently emerged as a promising treatment option for a variety of neurologic and developmental problems, including autism. AIMS: To review (systematically), for the first time, the medical literature that explores the safety in and efficacy of memantine in autism. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A comprehensive electronic search for relevant randomized controlled trials was conducted in four databases. Using RevMan software, we extracted and pooled data as a risk ratio (RR) or normalized mean differences in an inverse variance strategy. RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis includes five trials. There was no difference in enhancing social responsiveness when compared to placebo, though memantine lowered the likelihood of anxiety (RR = 0.25; 95% Confidence interval: [0.07; 0.87], p = 0.03). However, memantine aggravated impulsive behaviors. Additionally, in another trial that compared memantine added to risperidone versus risperidone added to placebo, memantine was found to be effective and safe. CONCLUSION: Memantine showed safety in reducing acute symptoms of anxiety and other symptoms encountered in pediatric patients with autism spectrum disorders. However, memantine does not improve the core symptoms of autism. Nevertheless, further long-term trials are needed to explore its potential efficacy.

Tolerability of memantine monotherapy versus adding memantine as combination therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies have focused on the clinical efficacy of combination therapy, donepezil and memantine, for patient's diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease. As a result, it has become increasingly routine for providers to prescribe both medications for all-cause neurodegenerative disorders in variable stages of disease. However, the potential adverse drug reactions while described as mild can have serious sequelae in older adults who are already managing the side effects of polypharmacy. This study looks to explore the tolerability of switching cholinesterase inhibitors to memantine monotherapy versus adding memantine as combination therapy for all-cause neurodegenerative disorders. MATERIALS & METHODS: The study is an IRB approved retrospective chart review that includes 175 patients diagnosed with neurocognitive disorders (ICD 10 F00-F03.91 and ICD10 G30-G31.84). Only side effects reported to and recorded by a neurocognitive subspecialist at Jefferson's Memory Disorder Center from 2016 to 2019 were included. RESULTS & DISCUSSION: The odds of a patient reporting side effects on combination therapy in comparison with those patients on memantine monotherapy reporting side effects were significantly greater (OR = 4.33, CI 95% (1.62, 11.52), p = 0.003). In our patient sample, more than 80% of the patients reporting side effects qualified as polypharmacy or excessive polypharmacy (Table 2). As a result, variable polypharmacy (p = 0.047) was statistically significant in the in a binary logistic regression model for predicting outcomes for patients on combination therapy (Table 3). Therefore, as a patient progresses to moderate-severe stages of disease, we recommend switching CI monotherapy to memantine monotherapy as opposed to adding memantine as combination therapy for those patients on more than 10 other medications to increase tolerability. Given the limitations of a smaller sample size, variables such as severity of disease, renal and liver impairment as well as medication dosing were not significant predictors (Table 3) for those reporting side effects on combination therapy.